Agrarian Economy 2024 Т. 17 № 3-4: 39-52

EFFICIENCY OF PARKS FUNCTIONING AND USE OF BUDGET FUNDS IN THE PARK INDUSTRY

Cherevko H., Doctor of Economic Sciences, professor
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-0072-5816
Cherevko I., Doctor of Economic Sciences, professor
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-8411-6136
Petrechkiv Kh., student
ORCID ID: 0009-0005-7596-2647
Lviv National Environmental University

https://doi.org/10.31734/agrarecon2024.03-04.039

ANNOTATION

The purpose of this article is to present the findings of a study on the conditions and trends in the development of the park industry and to identify the key directions for enhancing the efficiency of parks as a factor in the sustainable development of regions. To achieve this goal, several tasks were carried out during the study, including: identifying the essence, role, and functions of parks as budgetary institutions; determining the characteristics of the operation and financing of budgetary institutions; summarizing the concept of efficiency as an economic category and identifying the specific features of efficiency in budgetary institutions and the use of budgetary funds; characterizing parks as recreational and leisure budgetary institutions, with a focus on the Nature Conservation Recreational Institution of the Park-Monument of Garden and Park Art of National Importance, "Stryiskyi Park"; exploring the potential for integrating foreign experiences into the activities of the studied institution to improve the organization of work, diversify services, and introduce innovative recreational technologies with appropriate technical support to enhance the implementation of their designated functions and increase the efficiency of budget fund utilization. The methodology employed in this research is grounded in a general scientific dialectical approach, combining historical and logical methods for the study of economic phenomena, and incorporating induction and deduction, analysis and synthesis, as well as scientific abstraction. A methodological framework for assessing the efficiency of budget fund usage at the Nature Conservation Recreational Institution, "Stryiskyi Park," was proposed and applied based on the degree to which it fulfills its main functions. This assessment was informed by feedback from direct consumers of the institution's services and analyzed using relevant financial indicators over time. To implement this efficiency assessment approach, visitor surveys were conducted as part of the study. Additionally, the findings of surveys performed by other researchers were analyzed. The information base for the study included relevant publications from both domestic and international scholars and practitioners in the field of management, data from statistical sources, legislative materials available during wartime, and financial reports from the institution under investigation. The key outcomes of the research included an overview of the evolution of parks from their inception to the present day, the identification of existing challenges in their development, and the suggestion of effective strategies for diversifying park services to improve the efficient use of budget funds.

KEYWORDS

park, budget funds, efficiency, services, technologies

FULL TEXT

LINK

  1. Bittel, L. R., 1994. A short course of management. PWN Scientific Publishing House. Warsaw.
  2. Bruner, A. G., Gullison, R. E., Rice, R. E. & B.da Fonseca, G. A., 2000. Effectiveness of Parks in Protecting Tropical Biodiversity. Science, 291, p. 125–128.
  3. Cabała, P., 2007. Introduction to praxeology. Review of the principles of effective action. Academy of Economics Publishing House, Kraków.
  4. City park – the green heart of cities, 2022 [online] Available at: https://inspi rowaninatura.pl/rola-parkow-space-miejskiej/. [Accessed October 16, 2024].
  5. CPRA ACPL, 2024 [online] Available at: https://cpra.ca/about/what-is-cpra. [Accessed October 15, 2024].
  6. Daszkowska, M., 1998. Services. Production, market, marketing. PWN, Warszawa.
  7. Decision No. 304 of the Lviv City Council dated 13.04.2017 On Amendments to the Decision of the Executive Committee dated 03.09.2010 No 1192 [online] Available at: https://www8.cityadm.lviv.ua/Pool/Info/doclmr_1.NSF/(Search ForWe)/AD8 36 98DC8D0ED2BC22581020026A825?Open Document [Accessed November 15, 2024].
  8. Drucker, P. F., 1994. Management practice. Modernity Library. Warsaw.
  9. Fedosov, V., Oparin, V., Liovochkin, S., 2012. Financial restructuring in Ukraine: problems and directions [monograph]. Kyiv: KNEU.
  10. Financial report "Stryiskyi Park" for 2021 [online] Available at: https:// opendata.city-adm.lviv.ua/ dataset/ finansova-zvitnist-stryiskyi-park-za-2021-rik/resource/83e7a9ae-b631-4d6b-9269-c0c861409 8a5. [Accessed November 15, 2024].
  11. Financial report "Stryiskyi Park" for 2023 [online] Available at: https://data. gov.ua/dataset/finansova-zvitnist-stryiskyi-park-za-2023-rik. [Accessed November 15, 2024].
  12. Fortuna-Antoszkiewicz, B., 2019. Vegetation in spatial composition: values and preservation of heritage. SGGW Publishing House, Warsaw.
  13. Frych, R. M., 2012. Characteristics of budgetary institutions as subjects of financial law. State and regions. Series "Law and public administration", 2, p. 115–119.
  14. Guziejewska, B., 2008. Efficiency of local government finances. National Economy, 5–6, p. 71–89.
  15. Kacprzyk, W., 2009. Parks − social expectations. [in:] Greenery of cities and villages, contemporary and historic. Edited by M. E. Drozdek.
  16. Lead. Connect. Reinvent. BCRPA Annual Report. 2020/21, 2024 [online]. Available at: https://www.bcrpa.bc.ca/media/306688/ar-2020-21.pdf. [Accessed October 14, 2024].
  17. Łukaszkiewicz, J., 2019. Greenery and human health and recreation [online]. Available at: https://raport.togetair.eu/ziemia/przyroda-i-ochrona-srodowiska/ greenery and human health and recreation. [Accessed November 05, 2024].
  18. Nowak-Rząsa, M., 2009. Contemporary functions of city parks in the aspect of social expectations. Science, Nature, Technologies, 3 (1), p. 1–5.
  19. Our park and recreation story, 2021. NRPA Annual Report. 2021. Florida.
  20. Parks and Recreation Foundation, 2021 [online] Available at: https://vhal.org/vhprf/ [Accessed October 15, 2024].
  21. Parks of Ukraine, 2023 [online] Available at: https://travel-guide.in.ua/uk/article/ 60/parki-ukrayini. [Accessed January 15, 2024].
  22. Stryjski Park – the most beautiful park in Lviv, 2021 [online]. Posted at: https: //www.kresy.com/ns,Park-Stryjy-najpiekniej-park-we-Lviv. [Accessed October 15, 2024].
  23. Svirko, S. V., 2013. Accounting in budgetary institutions: methodology and organization. Kyiv: KNEU.
  24. Top 10 interesting parks in Europe, 2024 [online] Available at: https://klr.com.ua/blog/top-10-tsikavykh-parkiv-yevropy. [Accessed October 19, 2024].
  25. Vanclay, J. K., 2001. The Effectiveness of Parks. Science, 293 (5532), p. 1007. DOI:10.1126/science.293.5532.1007a.
  26. Vernihorova, N. V., 2023. Institutional innovations in the development of urban parks in Ukraine. Economic Journal of Odessa Polytechnic University, 2 (24), p. 35–43. DOI: 10.15276/EJ.02.2023.4. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8128451.
  27. Vernihorova, N., 2021. Urban Parks as an Innovative Social Space and a Factor of Social and Environmental Welfare. Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series "Economics", 8 (4), p. 69–78.
  28. What do Poles think about city parks? 2018 [online] Available at: http://forum samorzadowe.pl/aktualnosci/2961,,,,co_polacy_mysla_o_parkach_miejski.html. [Accessed November 05, 2024].